← Search

Amy Studts

LA Vista, NE
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
80 matches · 54W–26L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Amy Studts to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history80 matches
L
Jo Lehan / Cynthia Waldrop
2026-09-02 · Obermier · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heather Siebken
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-26 · Obermier · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heather Siebken
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-30 · Hazelrigg · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kasey Hesse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-23 · Hazelrigg · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Shefsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-06-16 · Hazelrigg · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Christensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-09 · Hazelrigg · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cheryl Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-02-22 · Hazelrigg · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kasey Hesse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-02-15 · Hazelrigg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Denise Hazelrigg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
L
2026-01-11 · Hazelrigg · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Christensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2025-07-08 · Hazelrigg · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-07-01 · Hazelrigg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kasey Hesse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-06-20 · Tong · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Adam Studts mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 59.6% of games
3.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 43% of games
3.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 55.6% of games
4.0
27.8%
5W–13L · 45.4% of games
6.0mixed
88.9%
8W–1L · 65% of games
7.0mixed
93.8%
15W–1L · 72.2% of games
8.0mixed
90.9%
10W–1L · 67.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
19 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
5 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova