← Search

Silpa Yalamanchili

Raleigh, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
123 matches · 80W–43L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Silpa Yalamanchili to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history123 matches
L
2026-08-31 · La.Redmond18C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Hobbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-08-10 · La.Redmond18C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Maryanna Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-21 · Sa.BrodyMoses18S · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-07-15 · Sa.BrodyMoses18S · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
Courtney Phillips
2026-07-15 · Sa.BrodyMoses18S · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-06-10 · Sa.BrodyMoses18S · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
W
N/A
2026-03-29 · Am.Hobbs18A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Boney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-02-28 · Am.Hobbs18A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Boney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-10-17 · #1 Doubles · with Lauren Redmond championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
Emma Coblentz / Diane Allen
2025-10-13 · #1 Doubles · with Lauren Redmond championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2025-10-06 · La.Redmond18C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Gillespie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
Emily Larson / Griffin Lamb
2025-09-29 · La.Redmond18C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Gillespie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
70.6%
36W–15L · 59.6% of games
3.5
52.4%
11W–10L · 51% of games
5.5
50%
5W–5L · 48.2% of games
6.5
68.4%
13W–6L · 56.7% of games
3.0mixed
90%
9W–1L · 65.9% of games
6.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 58.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
20 matches
#2 Singles
13%
16 matches
#1 Singles
11%
14 matches
#3 Singles
9%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova