← Search

Beth Kramer

Omaha, NE
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
66 matches · 34W–32L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Beth Kramer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history66 matches
L
2026-05-27 · Gotsdiner · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Betsy Murphy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-13 · Gotsdiner · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ginger Garfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-06 · Gotsdiner · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alexis Beller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-03 · Gotsdiner · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Victoria Vinton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-29 · Gotsdiner · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gina Alati
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-15 · Gotsdiner · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-03-16 · Gay · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Conlon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2024-09-11 · Jorgensen · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Shellyn Sands
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
W
2024-08-14 · Jorgensen · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kim Foral
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2024-07-10 · Tanis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Conlon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2024-07-09 · Tanis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Conlon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2024-07-01 · Tanis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tonee Gay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
73.1%
19W–7L · 65.3% of games
3.5
37.8%
14W–23L · 44% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
11 matches
#1 Singles
11%
7 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe