← Search

Monte Lehmkuhler

Virginia Beach, VA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
140 matches · 85W–55L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Monte Lehmkuhler to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history140 matches
L
2026-07-21 · Sabio - Balls and Dolls · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Vinita Folck mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-14 · Sabio - Balls and Dolls · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sheryl Harris mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-08 · PACC - Long · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Russell Lyons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-05-25 · PACC - Long · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Long
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-05-04 · PACC - Long · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Frazier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
Amilcar Gomez / Seungyeon Kim
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · with Caroline Dozier championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
Mike Hill Jr / Julie Morris
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · with Caroline Dozier championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-05-01 · #3 Doubles · with Caroline Dozier championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
Ron Best / Jessica Bynum
2026-05-01 · #2 Doubles · with Nicole Legum championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-29 · Balls and Dolls -Sabio · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janice Sabio mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-04-27 · PACC - Long · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-04-21 · Bracey - Mixed Cocktail · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Zoe Fraser mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
56.2%
27W–21L · 52.9% of games
4.0
50%
2W–2L · 53.2% of games
7.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 63.8% of games
8.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
62.5%
10W–6L · 58.6% of games
7.5mixed
81.8%
18W–4L · 60% of games
8.0mixed
60%
9W–6L · 53.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 35% of the time
#3 Doubles
35%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
45 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
38 matches
#2 Singles
4%
5 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams