← Search

Jegan Podhanur

Morganville, NJ
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
165 matches · 115W–50L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Jegan Podhanur to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history165 matches
L
Mike Perekupka / Jonathan Lu
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Harish Jayabalan championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-01 · #1 Doubles · with Ivan Khudziakou championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-14 · NJD/We Are Still A Problem · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Griffin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-13 · NJD/Jersey Dreamers · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nischint Manelkar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
Michael Hamilton / Jerry Zhang
2026-06-07 · NJ: Jersey Strikers · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Theron McInnis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-17 · NJ: Jersey Strikers · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pavel Baresh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-09 · NJD/Jersey Dreamers · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Harish Jayabalan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-05-08 · Volley Llamas · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rudolf van Mol
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-05-02 · NJD/Jersey Dreamers · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nischint Manelkar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-04-26 · Clutch Crew · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nischint Manelkar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-04-18 · Lost-Soles · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Risi Oseni mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-28 · Clutch Crew · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Manny Negron
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
75.9%
44W–14L · 58% of games
4.0
72.8%
59W–22L · 59.2% of games
7.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 56.4% of games
8.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 45.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
70 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
59 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
32 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova