← Search

Jennifer Farah

Troy, MI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
162 matches · 94W–68L · seasons 2017–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Farah to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history162 matches
L
2026-07-25 · #2 Doubles · with Melanie Hovey championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-17 · BRC-Kozak 18s 3.0 NW F4 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-17 · TROY-Colbert 18s 6.0X F · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tim Walter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-14 · TROY-Vondell 40s 3.0 NW F2 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melanie Hovey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-06-25 · BRC-Kozak 18s 3.0 NW F4 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dana Shanbrom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
Jose Rivera / Vanessa Roxas
2026-06-19 · TROY-Colbert 18s 6.0X F · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Dix mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-18 · BRC-Kozak 18s 3.0 NW F4 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Costello
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-16 · TROY-Vondell 40s 3.0 NW F2 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristen Ruud
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-14 · BRC-Kozak 18s 3.0 NW F4 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dana Shanbrom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-05 · TROY-Colbert 18s 6.0X F · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tim Walter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-04 · BRC-Kozak 18s 3.0 NW F4 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dana Shanbrom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-05-28 · BRC-Kozak 18s 3.0 NW F4 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
100%
6W–0L · 66.7% of games
3.0
60.4%
55W–36L · 55.6% of games
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0
52.6%
10W–9L · 54.9% of games
6.5
57.1%
16W–12L · 53.5% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 51.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 31% of the time
#3 Doubles
31%
50 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
39 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
37 matches
#2 Singles
7%
11 matches
#1 Singles
6%
9 matches
#3 Singles
5%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova