← Search

Amanda Barrow

Port Chester, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
106 matches · 69W–37L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Amanda Barrow to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history106 matches
L
2026-07-21 · #2 Doubles · with Shannon Smith championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Cramer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-24 · ATC Armonk Aces 18+ 4.0 Day · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shannon Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-23 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janine Huiskes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4
W
2026-06-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shannon Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-05-26 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Courtney McKinney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-20 · ATC Armonk Aces 18+ 4.0 Day · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Zarba
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6
L
2026-05-05 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Schwartz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-26 · CP:Double Trouble:Fine/Bria · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ted Fine mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-04-12 · CP:Double Trouble:Fine/Bria · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristian Calderon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-12 · Armonk Tennis: Kick Aces · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shannon Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-03-11 · CP:Serves You Right:Meyer/Woodruff · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shannon Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
78.3%
18W–5L · 68.7% of games
3.5
54.8%
23W–19L · 54.1% of games
4.0
64.7%
11W–6L · 57.9% of games
5.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 53.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
19 matches
#1 Singles
9%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe