← Search

Alexandra Deal

Louisville, KY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
111 matches · 67W–44L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Alexandra Deal to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history111 matches
L
2026-08-09 · KY/LOU/STEEN/DEAL · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Deal mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-14 · KY/LOU/STEEN/DEAL · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Deal mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-05-09 · KY/LOU/CANSLER · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dolores Radasch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
Holly Meadows / Emily White
2026-05-04 · KY/LOU/CANSLER · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cheryl Fox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-19 · KY/LOU/JORDEN/STEEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abigail Stewart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-22 · KY/LOU/JORDEN/STEEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacia Cox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
Patricia Smith / Michelle Brooks
2026-03-21 · KY/LOU/CANSLER · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cheryl Fox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-08 · KY/LOU/JORDEN/STEEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nikki Rutledge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-02-22 · KY/LOU/JORDEN/STEEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lindsey Newcomer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-02-21 · KY/LOU/JORDEN/STEEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Christopher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-08 · KY/LOU/JORDEN/STEEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lindsey Newcomer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-02-01 · KY/LOU/JORDEN/STEEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nikki Rutledge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
58.3%
7W–5L · 54.2% of games
3.0
88.9%
24W–3L · 68.3% of games
3.5
38.5%
15W–24L · 44.7% of games
4.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
5.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
40%
2W–3L · 51.5% of games
3.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 55.6% of games
3.5mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 57.1% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
26 matches
#2 Singles
5%
5 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches
#3 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer