← Search

Sherley Kurtz

— year-end
83 matches · 29W–54L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Sherley Kurtz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history83 matches
W
2026-07-19 · BCC-Trotter · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Julia Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-12 · BCC-Trotter · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Joyce Hayden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-06-20 · KTC-Brooks · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Timm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-14 · BCC-Trotter · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Carol Bowling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-05-31 · BCC-Trotter · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Carol Bowling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-21 · QRRC-Williams · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cheryl Silcox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-17 · QRRC-Martin · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Daniele Sofer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2025-06-28 · BCC Ruef · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Penny Steinbrunner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-05-24 · BCC Ruef · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katie Ruef
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-05-17 · BCC Ruef · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Linda Mader
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-04-27 · KTC Silcox · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cheryl Silcox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2025-04-13 · KTC Silcox · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeanna Stecklein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
Teams26 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
51.4%
19W–18L · 51.1% of games
3.0
21.9%
7W–25L · 39.3% of games
5.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 45.9% of games
6.0
0%
0W–7L · 34.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 49% of the time
#2 Doubles
49%
41 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe