← Search

Jamie Martin

Raleigh, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
70 matches · 33W–37L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Jamie Martin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history70 matches
L
2026-08-22 · Ja.Martin18C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jessica Brock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-21 · Al.DeMacy40C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lauren Fye
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-20 · La.Fye18T4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rose Whitehurst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-13 · La.Fye18T4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa ONeill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-05-23 · La.Fye18T4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Peters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-18 · Ma.LaPlante18A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa ONeill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-11 · Ly.Manweiler40A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pam Rigsby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-30 · Ma.LaPlante18A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Molly Briggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-16 · Ma.LaPlante18A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa ONeill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
Amanda Williams / Amy Perry
2026-03-26 · Ma.LaPlante18A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa ONeill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-03-24 · Ma.LaPlante18A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maggie Patterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
Candace Hughes / Keshia Green
2025-10-11 · Ja.Martin18C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sara Mazurak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 52.9% of games
4.0
33.3%
12W–24L · 46.9% of games
7.5
61.1%
11W–7L · 52.8% of games
3.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
15 matches
#1 Singles
4%
3 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova