← Search

Kim Peters

— year-end
120 matches · 74W–46L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Kim Peters to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history120 matches
L
2026-09-02 · St.Luther40C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Fran Ange
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
Julie Kelly / Laura Capps
2026-08-29 · Je.Anderson18C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Melissa House
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-26 · St.Luther40C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stephanie Luther
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-22 · Je.Anderson18C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ann Skvarcius
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-12 · St.Luther40C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stephanie Luther
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-03 · Me.DeLorme18M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nathan Peters mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-01 · La.Fye18T4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa ONeill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-01 · Je.Anderson18C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ashley McCollum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-29 · Me.DeLorme18M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nathan Peters mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-25 · La.Fye18T4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sara Mazurak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-07-18 · La.Fye18T4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rose Whitehurst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-07-15 · St.Luther40S · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Teams38 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
88.9%
8W–1L · 64.7% of games
3.5
78.8%
26W–7L · 67.9% of games
4.0
53.8%
21W–18L · 54.5% of games
5.5
50%
2W–2L · 52.4% of games
6.5
75%
6W–2L · 69.3% of games
7.5
33.3%
5W–10L · 46.5% of games
3.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 31.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 41% of the time
#1 Singles
41%
49 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
13 matches
#2 Singles
9%
11 matches
#3 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer