← Search

Susan Fanelly

Raleigh, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
357 matches · 265W–92L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Susan Fanelly to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history357 matches
W
Melissa Phillips / Frances Wilson
2026-08-21 · NDraughon.55C-YMCA · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Deb Lanier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-08-09 · Ta.Parise18C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tanya Parise
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-08-09 · Ta.Parise18C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tanya Parise
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-08 · EHoover-YMCA · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diane Werner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
Laura Davidson / Jane Hunter
2026-08-02 · Ta.LeFevre55T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vicky Arne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
Elizabeth Hensley / Cynthia Smith
2026-07-30 · Ta.LeFevre55T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jackie Gore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-10 · EHoover-YMCA · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diane Werner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-03 · EHoover-YMCA · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tammy Sasser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
Lesley Knight / Cynthia Smith
2026-06-25 · Ta.LeFevre55T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diane Werner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-05 · EHoover-YMCA · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diane Werner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-05-29 · #3 Doubles · with Karen McKee championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-28 · #2 Doubles · with Lynn Dixon championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams79 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
79.5%
140W–36L · 61.1% of games
4.5
48.1%
13W–14L · 47% of games
7.5
79.7%
55W–14L · 63.1% of games
8.5
68%
17W–8L · 57.5% of games
4.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 51.7% of games
7.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 75.4% of games
8.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 62.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
193 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
81 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
77 matches
#2 Singles
1%
4 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match
#3 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert