← Search

Janet Wu

Kensington, MD
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
229 matches · 165W–64L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Janet Wu to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history229 matches
W
2026-09-11 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lora Bacanskas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-09-01 · Vissering · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Doug DeLawter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-24 · Thompson- TenACEious Team · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Ivester
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-23 · Team 3 Graces Aces · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Plexico
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-4
W
2026-07-13 · Tetrault - Spin-derellas · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Na Yi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · with Jennifer Exelby championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
Stephanie Pitts / Alexandra Phillips
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · with Jennifer Exelby championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-29 · Team 3 Graces Aces · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Zoie Acadia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-3
L
2026-06-28 · Thompson- TenACEious Team · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Ivester
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-26 · Vissering · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Renaldo Savady mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-22 · Team 3 Graces Aces · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Schreiber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-20 · Tetrault - Spin-derellas · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathy Crowley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams54 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
78%
39W–11L · 68.6% of games
4.0
72.5%
37W–14L · 59.4% of games
6.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
87.5%
14W–2L · 65.5% of games
8.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 50.7% of games
7.0mixed
70.5%
31W–13L · 61.3% of games
7.5mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 54.2% of games
8.0mixed
68.2%
15W–7L · 57.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
99 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
71 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
58 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer