← Search

Heather Ingram

Apex, NC
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
34 matches · 26W–8L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Heather Ingram to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history34 matches
W
2026-08-24 · TOC.Leahy · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-09 · TOC.Leahy · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-07 · TOC.Leahy · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-05-28 · TOC.Leahy · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-03 · TOC.Leahy · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Ehland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-19 · TOC.Leahy · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Ehland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-03-29 · TOC.Leahy · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Ehland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-03-19 · TOC.Leahy · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-03-15 · TOC.Leahy · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Ehland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2025-10-30 · TOC.Leahy · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-09-25 · TOC.Leahy · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2024-05-22 · TOC.Leahy · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Goodman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 65.8% of games
3.0
78.9%
15W–4L · 59.8% of games
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
80%
4W–1L · 67% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
16 matches
#1 Singles
18%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
4 matches
#2 Singles
6%
2 matches
#3 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer