← Search

Angela Ehland

Holly Springs, NC
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
64 matches · 21W–43L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Angela Ehland to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
L
2026-08-30 · TOC.Leahy · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stefanie Raysich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-08-23 · TOC.Leahy · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kimberley Ashmore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-16 · TOC.Leahy · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Holly Atkinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-03 · TOC.Leahy · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-26 · TOC.Leahy · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Duane Donders mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-07-09 · TOC.Leahy · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
Mary Wilson / Matt Bereda
2026-07-05 · TOC.Leahy · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Duane Donders mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-25 · TOC.Leahy · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-28 · TOC.Leahy · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-17 · TOC.Leahy · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Duane Donders mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-05-03 · TOC.Leahy · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heather Ingram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-19 · TOC.Leahy · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heather Ingram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
50%
8W–8L · 44.4% of games
3.5
25.9%
7W–20L · 42.4% of games
4.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 43.4% of games
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 34.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
12 matches
#1 Singles
11%
7 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams