← Search

Liza Terll

Pittsboro, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
137 matches · 76W–61L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Liza Terll to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history137 matches
L
2026-08-31 · MBlake-TOCH · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Meredith Bazemore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-24 · MBlake-TOCH · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kait Mckee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-23 · TOC.Shukla · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tracy Lowrance
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-22 · ACP.White · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Meredith Bazemore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-08-08 · ACP.White · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Rachel Kasongo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-01 · ABoone-BP · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Meredith Bazemore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-30 · NMAC.Stratemeier · #3 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-27 · NMAC.Lowrance · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dianna White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-15 · NMAC.Stratemeier · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-08 · MBlake-TOCH · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meghan Blake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-06 · DOrdronneau-BP · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-06 · MBlake-BP · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Delisa Ordronneau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
68.8%
11W–5L · 61.8% of games
3.0
48%
36W–39L · 50.6% of games
3.5
80%
4W–1L · 56% of games
5.0
80%
4W–1L · 64% of games
5.5
57.1%
12W–9L · 51.6% of games
6.5
20%
1W–4L · 44.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
39 matches
#1 Singles
15%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
18 matches
#2 Singles
9%
12 matches
#3 Singles
6%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova