← Search

David Kang

Minneapolis, MN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
24 matches · 8W–16L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add David Kang to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history24 matches
W
2026-03-09 · Parker Winter · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-02-23 · Parker Winter · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-16 · Parker Winter · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Palombi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-02 · Parker Winter · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Kline
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-01-26 · Parker Winter · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Greg Mikol
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-01-19 · Parker Winter · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Kolstad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-01-05 · Parker Winter · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kurtis Fechtmeyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-12-15 · Parker · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-12-08 · Parker · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2025-12-01 · Parker · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacson Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-11-17 · Parker · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Randal Rovinski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2025-11-03 · Parker · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.5
33.3%
8W–16L · 44.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 50% of the time
#2 Doubles
50%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
4 matches
#1 Singles
17%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
3 matches
#2 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe