← Search

Meg Sullivan-Eng

— year-end
31 matches · 20W–11L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Meg Sullivan-Eng to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history31 matches
W
2026-07-20 · Point Set, Siler/Crain · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Ferrucci
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-18 · Point Set, Stein/Weiler · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Judy Ward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-26 · Point Set, Stein/Weiler · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mandy Agnetti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-05-21 · Point Set, Sarnelli · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Fulya Li
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-06 · Point Set, Sarnelli · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Fulya Li
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-04-29 · Point Set, Sarnelli · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Sarnelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-03-15 · Point Set, Thomas/Crain · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Ferrucci
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2025-07-30 · #2 Doubles · with Fulya Li championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-07-28 · Point Set, Sarnelli · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Denise Quaco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-07-24 · Point Set, Sarnelli · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Fulya Li
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-2
W
Suzanne Wolfe / Eileen Marando
2025-07-17 · Point Set, Sarnelli · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Castellanos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-06-20 · Point Set, Crain/Sarnelli · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marie Romeo-Gough
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
Teams11 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
77.8%
14W–4L · 62.5% of games
3.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 32% of the time
#3 Doubles
32%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
23%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
4 matches
#1 Singles
7%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova