← Search

Jenna Straub

Louisville, KY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
64 matches · 45W–19L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Jenna Straub to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
W
2026-08-23 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL/VOSS · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ruth Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-18 · KY/LOU/HAWKINS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Dudas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-08-11 · KY/LOU/HAWKINS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cammie O'Connell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-04 · KY/LOU/HAWKINS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cammie O'Connell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-06-25 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL/GORDINIER · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ben Walker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-23 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cammie O'Connell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
Rebekah Cansler / Melanie Young
2026-05-09 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Blaney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-05-03 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzanne Bush
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-04-26 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Hanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-03-15 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Felicia Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-03-08 · KY/LOU/HOSTETLER · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Carol Steiden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
Taylor Jackson / Dawn Miesner
2026-03-04 · KY/LOU/HOSTETLER · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Allison Blaney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
100%
8W–0L · 71.9% of games
4.0
81.5%
22W–5L · 62.4% of games
4.5
0%
0W–7L · 35.6% of games
6.5
80%
4W–1L · 57.8% of games
7.5
75%
6W–2L · 60.4% of games
4.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 45.7% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
13 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert