← Search

Amy Koymen

Princeton, NJ
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
192 matches · 114W–78L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Amy Koymen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history192 matches
L
2026-09-12 · Tri-Hards · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Olivia Phan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-24 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-06-20 · Smart Aces · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michele Lopez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-19 · Wise Aces · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Bissol
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-17 · Split Steppers · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Valerie Tchikanda
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-13 · Smart Aces · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-5
W
2026-06-13 · Smart Aces · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lynne Buchman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-01 · Monmouth: Penn Ball Wizards · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michele Lopez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-05-29 · Wise Aces · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-0
L
2026-05-27 · Split Steppers · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michele Lopez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-26 · Diff'rent Strokes · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sue Pangis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-3
W
2026-05-18 · Monmouth: Penn Ball Wizards · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michele Lopez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 63.3% of games
3.0
77.3%
17W–5L · 64.2% of games
3.5
68.1%
62W–29L · 58.2% of games
4.0
37.1%
23W–39L · 45.8% of games
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 36% of the time
#1 Singles
36%
69 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
43 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
28 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe