← Search

Amber Jarvis

Chapel Hill, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
147 matches · 93W–54L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Amber Jarvis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history147 matches
W
2026-09-10 · CHaywood-DUR · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chace Ogle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-09-08 · ALeinbach.7.5C-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kristin Lahey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-31 · TWeber-DUR · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Button Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-26 · RDavis-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Baxter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-20 · CHaywood-DUR · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dallas Knight
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-18 · ALeinbach.7.5C-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kristin Lahey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-03 · TWeber-DUR · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tess Weber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
W
N/A
2026-07-30 · MLong.4.0-DUR · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeeka Karnas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-14 · BBlackburn-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Proctor mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-06-18 · ALeinbach-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Breah Woolson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-16 · MLong.3.5-DUR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shivam Panthri mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-11 · ALeinbach-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Strong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
47.1%
8W–9L · 50.2% of games
3.0
81%
17W–4L · 66.2% of games
3.5
47.4%
18W–20L · 51.3% of games
4.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 55.9% of games
5.0
75%
6W–2L · 58.9% of games
6.5
60%
12W–8L · 60.1% of games
7.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 62.1% of games
8.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 66.7% of games
3.5mixed
100%
6W–0L · 72% of games
4.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 55.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
52 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
34 matches
#1 Singles
20%
29 matches
#2 Singles
12%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King