← Search

Amy Knight

Tulsa, OK
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
82 matches · 38W–44L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Amy Knight to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history82 matches
L
2026-08-14 · Taylor 55s 6.0X/LF · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Richard Kenny mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-09 · Taylor 55s 6.0X/LF · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Richard Kenny mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-02 · Taylor 55s 6.0X/LF · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Richard Kenny mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-24 · Taylor 55s 6.0X/LF · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Richard Kenny mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-05 · Taylor 55s 6.0X/LF · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Richard Kenny mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-02 · Taylor55s 6.0/LF · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Darla Knight
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-18 · Taylor55s 6.0/LF · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rebecca Lydy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-03-28 · Taylor55s 6.0/LF · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Darla Knight
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-03-14 · Taylor55s 6.0/LF · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kristine Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2025-10-14 · Harrod/3.0W/TU · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Cameron
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2025-10-07 · Harrod/3.0W/TU · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ellie Carlberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-09-09 · Harrod/3.0W/TU · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
60.5%
23W–15L · 55.5% of games
3.0
22.2%
4W–14L · 43.8% of games
6.0
20%
1W–4L · 41.5% of games
5.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
55.6%
10W–8L · 49.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
38 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
19 matches
#1 Singles
5%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer