← Search

Barb Redford

Arvada, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
56 matches · 31W–25L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Barb Redford to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history56 matches
L
2026-09-12 · NJ GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Yonamine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-10 · NJ GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Haley Pouchot
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-08-05 · MVCC RED · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Fairchild
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-29 · MVCC RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beth Eiseman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-27 · NJ GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dawn Cartier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-22 · MVCC RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beth Eiseman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-07-06 · NJ YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melanie Abel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-24 · MVCC RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beth Eiseman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-06-13 · #2 Doubles · with Jordan Wessell championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-08 · NJ YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alison Castel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-01 · NJ YELLOW · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Haley Pouchot
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-05-25 · NJ BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Haley Pouchot
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.0
57.7%
30W–22L · 53.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 50% of the time
#2 Doubles
50%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
11 matches
#1 Singles
7%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova