← Search

Emily Thurman

Cincinnati, OH
4.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
10 matches · 6W–4L · seasons 2022–2024

Captains: add Emily Thurman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history10 matches
W
2024-07-24 · Eastern · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Allman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
L
2024-06-19 · Eastern · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Perin Goodman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
Judy Dennis / Sarah Edwards
2023-11-17 · Queen City Chrome · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leigh Ann Schinaman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2023-11-03 · Queen City Chrome · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leigh Ann Schinaman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 6-0
W
Christine Frey / Theresa Schenthal
2023-07-18 · Queen City Silver · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paula Danis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 5-3
L
Christine Frey / Eugenie Kreutzjans
2023-06-06 · Queen City Silver · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leigh Ann Schinaman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2022-11-18 · Queen City Chrome · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paula Danis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2022-11-11 · Queen City Chrome · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maggie Minich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-5, 0-2
L
Barbi Demoss / Krista Mcginness
2022-11-04 · Queen City Chrome · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Nye
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 2-3
W
2022-01-28 · Queen City Chrome · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leigh Ann Schinaman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2022–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 55.7% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 70% of the time
#1 Doubles
70%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
2 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova