← Search

Tulika Khemani

Scarsdale, NY
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
105 matches · 62W–43L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Tulika Khemani to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history105 matches
W
2026-07-13 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with MARIA MUSTE
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-07-08 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-26 · Life Time Emerald 18+ 3.0 Day · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-25 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-06-25 · Life Time Diamond 18+ 3.5 Day · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Nechamkin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-18 · Life Time Diamond 18+ 3.5 Day · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-12 · Life Time Emerald 18+ 3.0 Day · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lynn Pollack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
Alison Mackay
2026-06-11 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-11 · Life Time Diamond 18+ 3.5 Day · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patty Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-05 · Life Time Emerald 18+ 3.0 Day · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Renee Cohen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-5
L
2026-06-04 · Life Time Diamond 18+ 3.5 Day · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Renee Cohen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
80%
8W–2L · 65.5% of games
3.0
60%
48W–32L · 54.1% of games
3.5
25%
2W–6L · 48.6% of games
7.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 47.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
17 matches
#1 Singles
11%
12 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova