← Search

Laura Milano

— year-end
56 matches · 39W–17L · seasons 2023–2027

Captains: add Laura Milano to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history56 matches
L
2026-09-08 · Armonk Tennis Club Smart Aces 18+ 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Hack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
Christine Rupp / Jacqueline Mazzarone
2026-08-16 · #3 Doubles · with Ali Miller championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-08-15 · #4 Doubles · with Ali Miller championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-07-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Samantha Shinnick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-22 · #4 Doubles · with Ali Miller championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
W
Lesley Kalenson / Marcy French
2026-07-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ali Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-11 · CRRC Servive the Day 18+ 3.5 Day · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Sweeney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
Stefanie Vitti / Kelly Warrick
2026-06-10 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kate Mitchell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-04 · CRRC Servive the Day 18+ 3.5 Day · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diana Mann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-05-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathy Hammes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-14 · CRRC Servive the Day 18+ 3.5 Day · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diana Mann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-05-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shari Matusow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Teams18 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
88.5%
23W–3L · 65.3% of games
3.5
58.3%
14W–10L · 54.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
14 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
2 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe