← Search

Lindsay Duckworth

Salt Lake City, UT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
89 matches · 43W–46L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Lindsay Duckworth to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history89 matches
L
2026-07-27 · SM-Stroud Peterson/Wood · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Wilcox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-20 · SM-Stroud Peterson/Wood · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jenni Guynn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-05-05 · Sports Mall-Wood · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine van Uitert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-04-28 · Sports Mall-Wood · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-14 · Sports Mall-Wood · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-03-12 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Beames
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-5, 0-1
W
2026-03-05 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-3
L
2026-02-26 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-3
L
2026-02-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-01-29 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Beames
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-3
W
2026-01-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine van Uitert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-01-22 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shelley Petersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 58% of games
3.0
45.5%
10W–12L · 51.5% of games
3.5
47.2%
25W–28L · 50.2% of games
4.0
40%
2W–3L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
31 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
19 matches
#4 Doubles
17%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
14 matches
#1 Singles
6%
5 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert