← Search

Emily Hales

Farmington, UT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
184 matches · 117W–67L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Emily Hales to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history184 matches
W
2026-07-30 · Out of Your League · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heather Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-06 · Out of Your League · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karishma Shah
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-07 · Eagleridge-Mower · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Jensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-23 · Eagleridge-Mower · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shelley Petersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-09 · Eagleridge-Mower · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-12 · Eagleridge-Glines · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shelly Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-5, 0-1
L
2026-03-05 · Eagleridge-Glines · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bethany Bodily
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-26 · Eagleridge-Glines · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rosemary Glines
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-05 · Eagleridge-Glines · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Mcillece
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-5, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-01-29 · Eagleridge-Glines · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Mcillece
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-01-22 · Eagleridge-Glines · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
Nicole Garff / Jennifer Jensen
2025-12-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michele Halls
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
71.4%
25W–10L · 58.7% of games
3.5
64.7%
55W–30L · 54% of games
4.0
44.7%
17W–21L · 46.4% of games
6.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
25%
1W–3L · 44.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
55 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
25 matches
#1 Singles
10%
18 matches
#4 Doubles
9%
17 matches
#1 Female Doubles
5%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams