← Search

Jasmine Barr

New York, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
34 matches · 23W–11L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Jasmine Barr to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history34 matches
W
2026-06-02 · Gould/Welles · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natasha Caronna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-05-18 · Gould/Welles · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natasha Caronna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-12 · Metro: Gould/Welles · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natasha Caronna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-02-25 · Welles/Gould · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natasha Caronna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-12 · Welles/Gould · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Hanin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-01-27 · Welles/Gould · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ingrid Bateman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-01-22 · Welles/Gould · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natasha Caronna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2025-11-05 · Welles/Gould · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ingrid Bateman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-10-22 · Welles/Gould · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natasha Caronna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-10-14 · Welles/Gould · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natasha Caronna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2025-09-25 · Welles/Gould · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ingrid Bateman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-05-18 · Metro: Gould/Welles · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natasha Caronna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.5
66.7%
22W–11L · 55.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
41%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King