← Search

Ingrid Bateman

New York, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
11 matches · 10W–1L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Ingrid Bateman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history11 matches
W
2026-02-05 · Welles/Gould · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natasha Caronna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-01-27 · Welles/Gould · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jasmine Barr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-01-22 · Welles/Gould · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Flagg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
L
2026-01-15 · Welles/Gould · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natasha Caronna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-11-05 · Welles/Gould · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jasmine Barr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-10-30 · Welles/Gould · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natasha Caronna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-09-25 · Welles/Gould · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jasmine Barr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-05-13 · Welles/Gould · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jasmine Barr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-05-06 · Welles/Gould · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jasmine Barr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-04-30 · Welles/Gould · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jasmine Barr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-02-25 · Welles/Gould · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jasmine Barr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.5
90.9%
10W–1L · 62.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
46%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert