← Search

Natasha Caronna

— year-end
51 matches · 34W–17L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Natasha Caronna to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history51 matches
W
2026-06-02 · Gould/Welles · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jasmine Barr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
Yanshon Fullwood / Caroline Lewis
2026-06-01 · Gould/Welles · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Mark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-18 · Gould/Welles · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jasmine Barr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-25 · #3 Doubles · with Jenelle Aney championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-17 · #2 Doubles · with Grace de Fries championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-04-12 · Metro: Gould/Welles · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jasmine Barr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-02-25 · Metro: Gould/Welles · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Brod
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-25 · Welles/Gould · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jasmine Barr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-05 · Welles/Gould · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ingrid Bateman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-01-22 · Welles/Gould · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jasmine Barr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-01-15 · Welles/Gould · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ingrid Bateman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-10-30 · Welles/Gould · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ingrid Bateman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
Teams19 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.5
66%
31W–16L · 56.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
8 matches
#2 Singles
6%
3 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe