← Search

Michelle Dickason

— year-end
232 matches · 155W–77L · seasons 2020–2027

Captains: add Michelle Dickason to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history232 matches
L
2026-09-10 · Lee(Huntley)/PH/40&over4.0W · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Linda Baugher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-09 · Harris/PH/40&over3.5W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Baugher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-20 · Adams/LF/tri 4.5W · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kim McGinty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Stefanie Lee / John Lee
2026-08-14 · Webster/LF/tri 8.0X · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with CHRISTOPHER DICKASON mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-04 · Adams/LF/tri 4.5W · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Cindy Crowder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-30 · Adams/LF/tri 4.5W · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kim McGinty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
Corey Wilson / London Walker
2026-07-26 · Webster/LF/tri 8.0X · #3 Doubles · 5.0 · with Brian Webster mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-20 · Adams/LF/tri 4.5W · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Cindy Crowder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-17 · Webster/LF/tri 8.0X · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with CHRISTOPHER DICKASON mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-17 · Guernsey/LF 18s 8.0X · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thomas Arens mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-15 · Adams/LF/tri 4.5W · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kim McGinty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-08 · Adams/LF/tri 4.5W · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Devon Chatley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Teams61 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
81.8%
27W–6L · 62.2% of games
3.0
77.5%
31W–9L · 66.8% of games
3.5
54.7%
29W–24L · 53.7% of games
4.0
29.4%
5W–12L · 44% of games
5.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
76.9%
30W–9L · 60.6% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
26W–13L · 56.4% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 56.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
72 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
68 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
61 matches
#1 Singles
8%
19 matches
#2 Singles
4%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer