← Search

Kelly Gill

— year-end
119 matches · 88W–31L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Kelly Gill to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history119 matches
W
Stephanie White / Lil Rudd
2026-09-08 · Gill/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Heidi Wharton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
Tiffany Knighton / Terri Smith
2026-09-03 · Bender/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carly McWatters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-09-02 · Bender/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lacey Moody
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-09-01 · Gill/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shannon Finks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-27 · Bender/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carly McWatters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-18 · Gill/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Heidi Wharton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
Ashley Wallace / Stephanie White
2026-08-13 · Bender/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Abby Spann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-07-01 · Wittke/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leslie Barron
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-10 · Wittke/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leslie Barron
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-03 · Wittke/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Laschober
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-06 · Haynes/Memphis · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-30 · Haynes/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paige Lonergan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
Teams42 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
87.5%
21W–3L · 73.5% of games
3.5
73.7%
28W–10L · 63.9% of games
4.0
69.2%
18W–8L · 57.3% of games
4.5
50%
2W–2L · 45.8% of games
5.5
75%
3W–1L · 58.6% of games
6.5
72.7%
8W–3L · 67.4% of games
7.5
66.7%
8W–4L · 57.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 39% of the time
#1 Singles
39%
46 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
20 matches
#2 Singles
11%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
9%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer