← Search

Abby Spann

Collierville, TN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
57 matches · 41W–16L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Abby Spann to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history57 matches
W
2026-09-10 · Bender/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stephanie Longsworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-27 · Bender/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Taylor Bender
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
Ashley Wallace / Stephanie White
2026-08-13 · Bender/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelly Gill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-06-15 · Campbell/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Eckelkamp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-04-30 · Goetsch/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dianna Ptacek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-04-16 · Goetsch/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Louisa Bowie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-04-15 · Campbell/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dorothy Work
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-08 · Campbell/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cait Shirilla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-04-03 · Campbell/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Eckelkamp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-03-31 · Campbell/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tiffany Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-03-26 · Goetsch/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cait Shirilla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-03-05 · Goetsch/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cait Shirilla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
85.7%
12W–2L · 60.6% of games
3.5
68.2%
15W–7L · 58.8% of games
4.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 53.3% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 56.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
8 matches
#1 Singles
7%
4 matches
#2 Singles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova