← Search

Lil Rudd

— year-end
74 matches · 37W–37L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Lil Rudd to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history74 matches
L
2026-09-13 · Laschober/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jeanne Wilbourn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-08 · Eason/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stephanie White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-25 · Laschober/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kimberly Laschober
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
Elizabeth Lewis / Stephanie Sheahan
2026-08-25 · Tayloe/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Virginia Burbank
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-20 · White/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stephanie White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
Cindy Miller / Alyssa Ivey
2026-08-19 · Eason/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kim Battaile
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-08-16 · Tayloe/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mary Johnston Tayloe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-07-13 · Musick/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Wallace
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-12 · Hayes/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Pettit mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-02 · Musick/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with ANITA ARBELAEZ
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-29 · Musick/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catie Carter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-15 · Musick/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lauren Langston Scrugham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
Teams63 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
70.6%
24W–10L · 56.1% of games
4.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 35.1% of games
7.5
0%
0W–4L · 38.3% of games
8.5
23.5%
4W–13L · 42.4% of games
4.0mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 47.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
15 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe