Amber Scott
Columbus, OH
236 matches · 150W–86L · seasons 2019–2027
Captains: add Amber Scott to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history236 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
Danielle Halligan / Michelle Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
75.6%
59W–19L · 61.7% of games
4.0
45%
27W–33L · 49.2% of games
6.5
84.6%
22W–4L · 64.6% of games
7.5
55.6%
30W–24L · 53.8% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 29% of the time
#2 Doubles
29%
69 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
67 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
49 matches
#1 Singles
14%
34 matches
#2 Singles
7%
16 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.