← Search

Ericka Briceno

Boise, ID
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
29 matches · 7W–22L · seasons 2023–2025

Captains: add Ericka Briceno to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history29 matches
L
2025-10-21 · A & E · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kristen Pentz-Weitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-09-30 · A & E · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Liz Barbee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-09-23 · A & E · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cecilia Jozwik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-09-11 · A & E · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jennifer Jensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-05-17 · Met Your Match · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Silva
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-05-15 · Met Your Match · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
Matthew Wirth / Jennifer Boyd
2025-05-10 · Mixed Madness · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jason Bish mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-05-06 · Met Your Match · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2025-05-03 · Mixed Madness · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Greg Kreller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-04-29 · Met Your Match · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-04-12 · Mixed Madness · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mike McNabb mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-03-16 · Mixed Madness · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mike McNabb mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
50%
4W–4L · 47.5% of games
3.0
0%
0W–7L · 22.7% of games
5.5
75%
3W–1L · 60.5% of games
6.0
0%
0W–4L · 37.1% of games
6.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 24.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
6 matches
#1 Singles
14%
4 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert