← Search

Jacqueline Lawley

Boise, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
128 matches · 76W–52L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Jacqueline Lawley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history128 matches
W
2026-05-11 · SLAY! · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tannan Koehl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-04-22 · SLAY! · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tannan Koehl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-04-20 · SLAY! · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tannan Koehl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-04-15 · SLAY! · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tannan Koehl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-08 · SLAY! · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jule Ryan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-04-01 · SLAY! · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tannan Koehl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-02-23 · Tri-Harders · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Glory Questad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-16 · Tri-Harders · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jule Ryan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
W
2026-02-11 · Tri-Harders · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Tannan Koehl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-10-21 · CC DD 6.0 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ruth Adler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
N/A
2025-10-16 · CC DD 6.0 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Morgan White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-09-29 · Crane Creek DD's 7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tanya Vaughan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
60%
6W–4L · 55% of games
3.0
59.6%
28W–19L · 55.9% of games
3.5
33.3%
7W–14L · 47.6% of games
6.0
61.5%
8W–5L · 56.1% of games
7.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 58.5% of games
5.5mixed
100%
7W–0L · 72.8% of games
6.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 56.1% of games
6.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 35% of the time
#3 Doubles
35%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
41 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
38 matches
#1 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer