← Search

Betsy Gillenwater

MADISON, MS
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
18 matches · 12W–6L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Betsy Gillenwater to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history18 matches
L
2026-07-07 · Britt, Virginia · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Elizabeth Ducote
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-30 · Britt, Virginia · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Vicki Sinclair
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-19 · Britt, Virginia · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Tori Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-12 · Britt, Virginia · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Amy Adcox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-21 · Britt, Virginia · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-14 · Britt, Virginia · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Adcox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-03-31 · Britt, Virginia · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tracy Roan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2024-08-19 · Mangum, Emily · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Neil Stewart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2024-07-11 · Mangum, Emily · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jaime van Dan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2024-06-27 · Mangum, Emily · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Elizabeth Bailey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2024-06-13 · Mangum, Emily · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jaime van Dan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2024-06-06 · Mangum, Emily · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Sallie Marie Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 54.9% of games
3.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 56.7% of games
5.5
75%
3W–1L · 61.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 67% of the time
#1 Doubles
67%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
2 matches
#1 Singles
6%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal