← Search

Jaime van Dan

Ridgeland, MS
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
98 matches · 36W–62L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Jaime van Dan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history98 matches
L
2026-07-14 · Mangum, Emily · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Elizabeth Bailey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-05 · Williamson, Blair · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bradley Thomas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-24 · Williamson, Blair · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Caleb Foxworth mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-23 · Mangum, Emily · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Elizabeth Bailey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
Michael Barnard / Shiniqual Washington
2026-06-17 · Williamson, Blair · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Blair Williamson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-10 · Williamson, Blair · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Peter Mills mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-09 · Mangum, Emily · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Samantha Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-27 · Williamson, Blair · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jordan Stentiford mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-05-26 · Mangum, Emily · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Samantha Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-12 · Mangum, Emily · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Elizabeth Bailey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-05 · Mangum, Emily · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Angie Pletzke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-04-27 · Mangum, Emily · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
40%
8W–12L · 44.7% of games
3.0
30.6%
11W–25L · 46% of games
3.5
20%
1W–4L · 32.5% of games
5.5
30%
3W–7L · 48.6% of games
6.5
0%
0W–5L · 40% of games
3.0mixed
62.5%
10W–6L · 57.6% of games
6.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 48.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
17 matches
#1 Singles
14%
14 matches
#2 Singles
6%
6 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova