← Search

Amy Matsanoff

New Albany, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
57 matches · 41W–16L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Amy Matsanoff to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history57 matches
L
Molly Philipps / Amy Young
2026-09-11 · Scarborough 3 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Feasel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-05-08 · Scarborough 3 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erica Rozanczyk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-04-24 · Scarborough 3 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brooke Wancheck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-12 · Scarborough 2 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-04-10 · Scarborough 3 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lindsey Kelley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-03-27 · Scarborough 3 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brooke Wancheck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
Sarah Edwards
2026-03-22 · Scarborough 2 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-03-15 · Scarborough 2 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
Nicole Fernandez
2026-03-08 · Scarborough 2 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-03-06 · Scarborough 3 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
Christie Smith / Cara Grantier
2026-02-26 · Scarborough 3 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erica Rozanczyk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-02-22 · Scarborough 2 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2025–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
75.8%
25W–8L · 61.7% of games
3.0
61.9%
13W–8L · 53.1% of games
5.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 30% of the time
#2 Doubles
30%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
13 matches
#1 Singles
11%
6 matches
#2 Singles
11%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams