← Search

Kristen Yablonski

Bloomfield Hills, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
115 matches · 81W–34L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Kristen Yablonski to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history115 matches
W
2026-08-04 · TROY-Li 18s 7.0X F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gbenga Ogunyanwo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-25 · #4 Doubles · with Geri Bulka championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · with Leah Crafard championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-24 · TROY-Li 18s 7.0X F · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julian Vettraino mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-22 · WESS-Li 18s 3.5 NW F2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ewa Pluszczyk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
Ari Blank / Jamie Blank
2026-07-17 · LT-Pietrangelo 18s 8.0X F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nicholas Ludwig mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
Meredith Flynn / Laura Zapytowski
2026-07-08 · WESS-Li 18s 3.5 NW F2 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Perry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-07-06 · WESS-Li 40s 3.5 NW F4 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ewa Pluszczyk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-29 · WESS-Li 40s 3.5 NW F4 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne-charlotte Stern
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-06-20 · WESS-Li 40s 3.5 NW F4 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ewa Pluszczyk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-19 · TROY-Li 18s 7.0X F · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gbenga Ogunyanwo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-06-15 · WESS-Li 40s 3.5 NW F4 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ewa Pluszczyk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
57.1%
12W–9L · 51.3% of games
3.0
82.6%
19W–4L · 66.3% of games
3.5
73.9%
17W–6L · 59.7% of games
5.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 71.7% of games
6.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 60.1% of games
6.5
100%
5W–0L · 75.9% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 57.3% of games
8.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 42.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
22 matches
#1 Singles
17%
19 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
6 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert