← Search

Jamie Blank

Bloomfield Hills, MI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
43 matches · 28W–15L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jamie Blank to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history43 matches
W
2026-08-04 · FAC-Bartholomew 18s 8.0X F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ari Blank mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-20 · FAC- Brandt 18s 4.0 DW F · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chelsea Passmore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-17 · FAC-Bartholomew 18s 8.0X F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ari Blank mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-13 · FAC- Brandt 18s 4.0 DW F · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cheryl Lau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-08 · FAC-Bartholomew 40s 4.0 DW F · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Plamper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-06 · FAC- Brandt 18s 4.0 DW F · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Brandt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-24 · FAC-Bartholomew 40s 4.0 DW F · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Short
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-06-17 · FAC-Bartholomew 40s 4.0 DW F · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Short
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2025-08-14 · 6FAC-BRANDT WOMEN LOW 40 35 30 AUG TRI SEM F2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Short
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-08-11 · 6FAC-BRANDT WOMEN LOW 40 35 30 AUG TRI SEM F2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meredith Tipton
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-07-21 · 4FAC-BRANDT 40DW MO 18&O SEM F · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Brandt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-06-23 · 4FAC-BRANDT 40DW MO 18&O SEM F · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Short
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
68.6%
24W–11L · 61% of games
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
11 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova