← Search

Lauren Hildenbrand

— year-end
110 matches · 68W–42L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Lauren Hildenbrand to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history110 matches
L
2026-06-05 · Smashing Slice Girls · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-02 · Love Hurts · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-29 · Smashing Slice Girls · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Galef
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-15 · Smashing Slice Girls · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Galef
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-08 · Smashing Slice Girls · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-05-01 · Smashing Slice Girls · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Galef
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-04-28 · Love Hurts · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Sweeney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-04-24 · Smashing Slice Girls · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-04-21 · Love Hurts · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-14 · Love Hurts · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
Anna Doyle / Michele King
2026-03-05 · Smashing Slice Girls · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alicia Sikes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-0
L
2026-02-26 · Smashing Slice Girls · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-4
Teams18 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
69.6%
32W–14L · 55.7% of games
4.0
56.2%
36W–28L · 49.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 36% of the time
#1 Singles
36%
39 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
17 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal