← Search

Jyothishkumar Unnikrishnan Nair

— year-end
34 matches · 18W–16L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Jyothishkumar Unnikrishnan Nair to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history34 matches
L
2026-09-10 · Fee - Moore · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Stephen Pokol
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-14 · Fee - Nair · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rohan Ramdeholl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
N/A
2026-05-03 · Brevard/Simmons · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Margaret Staples mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-29 · Fee - Cortez · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alec Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-04-23 · Fee - Nair · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kenneth Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-17 · Fee - Nair · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-14 · Fee - Cortez · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-08 · Brevard/Simmons · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christina Kopp mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-02-19 · Fee Gold of Cortez · #2 Male Doubles · 10.5 · with Justin Hertzog
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-12 · Fee Gold of Cortez · #1 Male Singles · 10.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
Kenneth Moore / Michael Runda
2026-02-12 · Fee Gold of Cortez · #2 Male Doubles · 10.5 · with Gregory Whitaker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
Jeff Sidor / Toney McIntosh
2026-01-15 · Fee Gold of Cortez · #2 Male Doubles · 10.5 · with Gregory Whitaker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
Teams21 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
10.5
20%
1W–4L · 36.7% of games
3.5
100%
5W–0L · 76.4% of games
4.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 45.7% of games
4.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 59.1% of games
8.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 58.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
6 matches
#2 Male Doubles
12%
4 matches
#1 Singles
9%
3 matches
#2 Singles
6%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer