← Search

Jennifer Hogge

Cary, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
108 matches · 82W–26L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Hogge to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history108 matches
W
2026-07-16 · PW.Eichenseer · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-13 · PW.Eichenseer · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Singer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-06-29 · PW.Eichenseer · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marisa Kaufman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-06-23 · PW.Eichenseer · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Ledlow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-08 · PW.Eichenseer · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Dusina
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-03 · PW.Eichenseer · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-02 · PW.Eichenseer · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
Caroline Smith
2026-05-01 · PW.Hall · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-04-28 · PW.Federico · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-04-17 · PW.Hall · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Gillespie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-04-10 · PW.Hall · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
Sandy Alex / Emily Jones
2026-03-10 · PW.Federico · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Simone Hayward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 76% of games
3.0
76.9%
20W–6L · 65.1% of games
3.5
64.7%
22W–12L · 56.3% of games
5.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5
100%
4W–0L · 60.8% of games
6.5
88.9%
16W–2L · 66.1% of games
7.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 55.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
34 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
28 matches
#1 Singles
10%
11 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams