← Search

Simone Hayward

Cary, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
270 matches · 172W–98L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Simone Hayward to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history270 matches
L
2026-09-11 · PW.Burkey · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sarah Burkey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-10 · PW.Arndts · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Meghan Arndts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-03 · PW.Arndts · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Priya Desai
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-27 · PW.Arndts · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Paige Somol
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-08-08 · PW.Hayward · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Colin Hayward mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-4
L
2026-08-02 · PW.Hayward · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meghan Arndts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-30 · JHensley-DUR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colin Hayward mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-07-23 · JHensley-DUR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steve Pigora mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-19 · JHensley-DUR · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colin Hayward mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-07-18 · PW.Hayward · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Frank Bologa mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-16 · PW.Hayward · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Valerie Short
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-15 · PW.Bologa · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alexandra Dunn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams62 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
0.0
80%
8W–2L · 63.8% of games
2.5
81.5%
22W–5L · 69.5% of games
3.0
62.1%
41W–25L · 57.4% of games
3.5
43.5%
27W–35L · 49% of games
5.0
50%
5W–5L · 51.9% of games
5.5
68.2%
15W–7L · 58.4% of games
6.5
77.4%
24W–7L · 58.7% of games
7.5
0%
0W–5L · 34.4% of games
3.5mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 60% of games
6.0mixed
100%
12W–0L · 67.9% of games
7.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 52.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
85 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
73 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
63 matches
#1 Singles
9%
24 matches
#3 Singles
5%
14 matches
#2 Singles
4%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King