← Search

Anna Laudiero

ARLINGTON, VA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
87 matches · 58W–29L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Anna Laudiero to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history87 matches
W
2026-08-16 · Cedar Sprint · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kasey Kinney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-02 · Cedar Sprint · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-2
W
2026-07-12 · Cedar Sprint · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Lai
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-2
W
2026-06-06 · Team 2 WASABI PEAS 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Puzzuoli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-5
W
2026-05-30 · Team 2 WASABI PEAS 4.0 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-4
W
2026-05-09 · Cedar Sprint · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-03 · Cedar Sprint · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-02 · Cedar Sprint · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Binecki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-5
L
2026-05-01 · Team 2 WASABI PEAS 4.0 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-5
W
2026-04-12 · Cedar Sprint · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mindy Blakney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-04-11 · Cedar Sprint · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-2
L
2026-03-15 · Cedar Sprint · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ali Hamdani mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
83.3%
15W–3L · 62.6% of games
4.0
63.6%
21W–12L · 55.9% of games
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 51.4% of games
3.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 56.9% of games
7.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 60.8% of games
8.0mixed
46.2%
6W–7L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
27 matches
#1 Singles
30%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
13 matches
#2 Singles
7%
6 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams