← Search

Mindy Blakney

— year-end
223 matches · 149W–74L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Mindy Blakney to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history223 matches
L
2026-08-23 · My Shot · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-02 · My Shot · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-4
W
2026-07-25 · My Shot · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-3
L
2026-07-12 · My Shot · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-5
W
2026-06-06 · Cedar Sprint · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jasmine Mason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-03 · Cedar Sprint · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cameron Craig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-05-02 · Cedar Sprint · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cameron Craig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-4
W
2026-04-12 · Cedar Sprint · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anna Laudiero
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-04-11 · Cedar Sprint · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Binecki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-5
W
2026-03-21 · Double the Fun · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eva Safrankova
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-03-14 · Double the Fun · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tia Briscoe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-08 · Double the Fun · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eva Safrankova
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-4
Teams55 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
3.0
54.5%
6W–5L · 61.3% of games
3.5
75.4%
46W–15L · 63.5% of games
4.0
48.8%
20W–21L · 51% of games
5.5
100%
4W–0L · 64.4% of games
6.5
60%
3W–2L · 51.7% of games
7.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 58.8% of games
3.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 65.2% of games
4.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
66.7%
18W–9L · 57.9% of games
7.5mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 53.3% of games
8.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 59% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
104 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
71 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
35 matches
#1 Singles
4%
8 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer