← Search

Demetrius Crawford

Accokeek, MD
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
366 matches · 204W–162L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Demetrius Crawford to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history366 matches
L
2026-09-13 · Racq Pack · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with PAULA SMITH mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-26 · Racq Pack · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tina Rohm mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-22 · Racq Pack · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tina Rohm mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-01 · Racq Pack · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Danette Williams mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-21 · Racq Pack · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tina Rohm mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-18 · Racq Pack · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carrie Anderson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-09 · Racq Pack · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Danette Williams mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-06-07 · Well Strung · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan K Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-03 · Racq Pack · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carrie Anderson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-05-30 · Well Strung · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Abhishek Saxena
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-16 · Team 7 Net Assets · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Akash Agrawal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-16 · Well Strung · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with J Nathan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams66 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
0.0
100%
5W–0L · 64.3% of games
3.5
69.8%
44W–19L · 57.1% of games
4.0
51.2%
65W–62L · 50.2% of games
7.5
56.2%
9W–7L · 51.2% of games
8.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
0.0mixed
91.7%
11W–1L · 65.6% of games
3.5mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 50.5% of games
4.0mixed
70%
7W–3L · 59% of games
6.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
56.1%
23W–18L · 54.8% of games
7.5mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 48.8% of games
8.0mixed
34.6%
9W–17L · 43.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
125 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
105 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
82 matches
#1 Singles
10%
37 matches
#2 Singles
5%
17 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer